Stephen Doyne PhD

Jan who worked as Stephen Doyne's office manager of many years left this Voice message on Dr. Tadros' answering machine in June 2011

Appellate Court Does Not Validate Dr Stephen Doyne's Credentials and Experience

Dishonesty and Character:

The facts posted on thepubliccourt.com prove Doyne's credentials fraud. Stephen Doyne repeats his very same pattern of lying by bluffing the layman with the Appeal Decision. Stephen Doyne winning is simply not allowing any discovery of any of his claimed specialty credentials. It does not take more than an average IQ to simply understand that, and that Doyne tries hard to color it differently. The Appeal Court is saying that the public, and Dr. Emad Tadros, have no right to DISCOVERY over the truth about their Stephen Doyne's Court Expert Credentials. Dr. Tadros's (member of the public) loss is by preventing him any discovery in a court of law of Stephen Doyne's credentials. Stephen Doyne's pathological, deceiving lies, self-promoted by him, by broadcasting that the Appellate court validates his credentials and experience, is simply a lie!

Stephen Doyne has been misleading the public, judges and attorneys that he was honored by specialty certification in the forensic field, teaching at universities and being appointed as adjunct professor at the University of San Diego School of Law. Doyne violated the Mandatory Rules of Court that would qualify him to serve as expert witness of the court, and did not make his credentials transparent to the court or the public for a reason.There are attempts to get answers from Stephen Doyne not only by Dr. Tadros, but by other members of the Public to no vail. The Appellate Court essentially are giving him the green light that it is okay for him to lie and never allow discovery of his credentials claims, for a reason?

Stephen Doyne's fake vocabulary and his dishonesty have carried him far in San Diego. Stephen Doyne PhD became prominent by "Lying." Stephen Doyne continues to mislead the public by stating the Appellate Court validates his credentials and experience! He only relies on public naivety to believe this nonsense. This is yet one more solid proof that he is not willing to give up lying to mislead the public.

The Appellate Decision only affirmed the lower court decision that no discovery will ever be allowed to investigate Stephen Doyne's credentials, period! And if Doyne calls that winning, what does that tell any logical mind? The Court is essentially saying that because Stephen Doyne submitted work to the court, he can lie and cheat on his Resume, his Curriculum Vitae.

Universities' letters denied ever hiring Dr. Stephen Doyne with diligent research back to the 70s, and they checked long and hard through all digital and manual records. His CV says he taught there, and he himself can't produce anything proving such. Well-respected custody evaluator Dr. Stephen Doyne in the San Diego court system gained respect through lying about his credentials and teaching experience.

Honesty and Character. If Doyne lies on his CV, that is called "DISHONESTY." Someone who has gained the trust of the courts and the system through dishonesty. ABC 10News I-Team Investigation exposed Doyne through thorough investigation of the facts: 10News I-Team Investigation of Stephen Doyne

Stephen Doyne's CV states he was Adjunct Professor at University San Diego School of Law. But USD denies in writing having any record of Stephen Doyne, and its Office of the VP and Provost states in writing that although they have been able to find records for any full or part time faculty member, they found no record of Stephen Doyne ever there, even after checking with the Dean's office of the school of law, and all faculty.

Stephen Doyne's CV states he was an Instructor at UCSD. But UCSD denied any such claim. In his defense, Doyne produced a weekend seminar catalogue saying he taught a one-day seminar at one of the universities (that makes him an "instructor" at that university?), and produced a declaration from a professor who remembers Stephen Doyne taking his class with the intent to later teach the class. He did not produce a single person who remembered him teaching at these universities. No student, professor, staff, payroll, or anything. The letters from the universities, which deny any record of him, go back to the 70s, so his claim that "nobody keeps records that long" is simply not true. Had he taught in the 70s he could come up with at least a student or staffer or any tangible evidence. Stephen Doyne had nothing.

Doyne is NOT REAL board certified, and instead misleads with a diploma mill that also sold Diplomate credentials to a house cat where the American Bar Association documented it selling psychotherapist credentials to a cat named "Zoe" when the cat's owner applied using the name "Zoe D. Katz," and also mailed another one to an inmate in Prison. see more on 14-Board Exhibits

Be sure to click on the homepage of thepubliccourt.com to see the hard facts, credentials, University letters, etc. about Stephen Doyne.

Emad Tadros M.D.
Board Certified, Diplomate American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
San Diego Superior Court Expert Witness since 1993